Also Available:
Contributors include:
• Michael Ignatieff on whether torture is ever justified
• Juan Méndez on the victim’s perspective
• David Rieff on why the human rights community is naïve about torture
• Jamie Felner on domestic torture within U.S. prisons
• Sir Nigel Rodley on negotiating with torturers
• Julia Hall on rendition to torturing countries
• Jim Ross on the history of torture

—UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, ARTICLE 5 (1948)
Of all the issues on the human rights agenda, torture offered Americans the moral high ground . . . until this year. With the abuses at Abu Ghraib that led to accusations of torture within the domestic criminal justice system, the question of cruel and unusual treatment has taken on new urgency in the United States and elsewhere.
In Torture, twelve newly written essays by leading thinkers and experts range over history and continents, offering a nuanced, up-to the-minute exploration of this wrenching but timely topic, including, among others, Reed Brody on the road to Abu Ghraib and “ghost detainees”; Eitan Felner on the Israeli experience; Tom Malinowski on violations of State Department “forbidden practices” at Abu Ghraib and in Afghanistan; Kenneth Roth on the U.S. government’s shift from cover-up to justification; and Minky Worden on a global survey of torturing countries.
Intended for a general audience, some of the key questions addressed include how to define torture, whether torture is ever effective, and whether it is ever acceptable.
Kenneth Roth is executive director of Human Rights Watch. He has written articles on a range of human rights topics for the New York Times, the Washington Post, Foreign Affairs, and the International Herald Tribune, among other publications. He lives in New York City. Human Rights Watch has been defending human rights worldwide since 1978.
Spring 2005
paperback
6 1/8 x 7 7/8, 240 pages
978-1-59558-057-3

Other Editions:
For overseas orders, please contact your local representative from our
Sales & Distribution page.
